A webmaster forum specifically catering for Australian site owners. We discuss site development, marketing and management issues.
Please welcome our newest member, Jors308932!
Spice up your web site with the ultimate community message board solution!
Fake Id'sGet fake Id's made right now!
vBSEOSearch Engine Optimization for your VBulletin Forum.
AdminFusion
»
Replies/Topics
| | #1 |
| | |||||
|
Title: Apprentice Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 450 ![]() ![]() | Replies/Topics I'm getting plenty of replies, but not very many new topics. This one guy talks to me on MSN Messenger and wanted me to sign up to a forum that pays 12 cents a thread and 8 cents a reply. How about something like a 2:3 ratio for PostFusion? One replies gives you +1 balance, but a new topic gives you +1.5. This could be annoying for people who do not care if they get replies or new topics. You could have some settings that would let us choose between 1:1, 1:2, or 2:3. Replies would always be one, but if you wanted to post a new topic, you'd get a little more. The settings would also let you take off the higher reward for topics when you no longer need them. ...I don't know. I just need more topics and less replies. | ||||
| |
| | #2 |
| | #3 |
| | |||||
|
Title: Apprentice Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 450 ![]() ![]() | That is a good point. If you did the select on threads for thread starters, and then did a mysql_num_rows to get the number, you could just get the replie count based total posts - new threads. Also, there probably won't be a lot of forums with several thousand threads joining a post exchange program. Hitting the forum at any interval might be an issue, but it only needs to do the queries for members of the forum that are subscribed members here at PostFusion. Even if 500 forums sign up, not everyone will join that one forum. As for the pickup script, I have no idea. | ||||
| |
| | #4 |
| | |||||
|
Title: AF Lead Developer Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 1,186 Location: OHIO, US ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | while that works the count aggregate function would be better performance wise than mysql_num_rows. The problem with mysql_num_rows is that it pulls the entire dataset to count the results. This is added overhead that is not experienced with the aggregate function COUNT(). It is something that we can talk about if there is more interest, but at the current time I'm not sure if this is a direction we would want to go.
__________________ Do not post your PF private key in public. Did I help you with this post? If so, pls click the rep button or send money. | ||||
| |
